<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook has not been &#8220;valued&#8221; at $15 billion.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hooversbiz.com/2007/10/25/facebook-has-not-been-valued-at-15-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2007/10/25/facebook-has-not-been-valued-at-15-billion/</link>
	<description>Individuals &#8212; Companies &#8212; Industries: How We Work Now.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:31:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook: fluff and arrogant nonsense. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2007/10/25/facebook-has-not-been-valued-at-15-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook: fluff and arrogant nonsense. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/2007/10/25/facebook-has-not-been-valued-at-15-billion/#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>[...] but I would argue that if anything that is too modest.&#8221; Now, probably he&#8217;s not talking about me, but it&#8217;s worth noting that he doesn&#8217;t actually back up his argument. Instead, he uses [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but I would argue that if anything that is too modest.&#8221; Now, probably he&#8217;s not talking about me, but it&#8217;s worth noting that he doesn&#8217;t actually back up his argument. Instead, he uses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter's versatility, LinkedIn's utility, Facebook's valuation, and other social networking tidbits. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2007/10/25/facebook-has-not-been-valued-at-15-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter's versatility, LinkedIn's utility, Facebook's valuation, and other social networking tidbits. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/2007/10/25/facebook-has-not-been-valued-at-15-billion/#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>[...] enough things that I can still take it as a real comfort when I&#8217;m right. So far, Facebook has still never actually been valued at $15 billion. Henry Blodget points out how un-$15-billion-like Facebook is looking today: Facebook: Who Else [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enough things that I can still take it as a real comfort when I&#8217;m right. So far, Facebook has still never actually been valued at $15 billion. Henry Blodget points out how un-$15-billion-like Facebook is looking today: Facebook: Who Else [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
