The Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE): a first look.

rowe.jpg

How many of us really think that we must be in the office every day for eight hours to do our best work? Or to get our work done at all? Probably not many.

Well, Cali Ressler and Jody Thompson feel your pain, and they’ve proposed a whole new way of thinking about the working life in their forthcoming book, which is titled, bluntly enough, Why Work Sucks and How To Fix It.

The core of the book is their concept of the Results-Only Work Environment. Under their system, you and your company treat each other like grownups, capable of navigating the world of work without a million-bazillion rules about when and where you must show your face. Why? Because showing your face at a certain time and place doesn’t have any necessary relationship to how well you’re doing your job.

We’ve all knows folks who show up for work every day, “wear the flair” for the company, attend every meeting . . . and never make a dime’s worth of difference in how well the organization performs. Hey, maybe you’ve been that person when you were stuck in a low-excitement job.

The point is, time-serving does no one any good, because good work, profitability, social impact, and all the other things we say we’d like to accomplish don’t come from simple time-serving. (Ponder this: Martin Luther King was killed when he was 39 years old. It doesn’t take long to make an impact, if you put your guts into it.) No, results come from putting your energy into what you do.

Often this can be accomplished in short bursts. We tend to rediscover this in the few days before we leave for vacation, when mountains of work magically get done — or discarded — without hesitation. That’s when we cut out what Chris Brogan calls “fluff” and really get down to the brass tacks of our work.

What’s needed is a better approach to measuring how work gets done in your world. I came across the ROWE material by reading a post from Darren Barefoot that reminded me of Paul Graham’s thoughts on the subject:

The basic idea behind office hours is that if you can’t make people work, you can at least prevent them from having fun. If employees have to be in the building a certain number of hours a day, and are forbidden to do non-work things while there, then they must be working. In theory. In practice they spend a lot of their time in a no-man’s land, where they,re neither working nor having fun.

It’s not a mistake, of course, that so many high-achieving workplaces (Google, Bloomberg, Container Store, etc.) are peopled with employees who are both working and having fun. That’s a far sight better than all those Office Space-like offices that kill results while also crushing the human spirit out of their denizens.

I’m looking forward to Cali and Jody’s book — I’ll let you know what I think once I’ve read it.

Meanwhile: how well does your workplace run from the standpoint of “Results-Only”?

Category: Management, The working life

If you liked this post, please consider subscribing to the RSS feed so you can receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.

6 Comments so far

Kyle February 12th, 2008 1:10 pm

I agree 200%!

There is nothing like waking up and wanting to do something that makes a difference and makes you feel good, but being locked up behind a 4 walled prison with someone standing over you telling you what to do, when to do it and how to do it just squashes you.

I love micromanagement!

dblwyo February 12th, 2008 2:33 pm

Tim – you’re on a real roll here, intended or not, on getting the most of people. Love the Wooden story and it’s dead on. Bob Sutton covers some of this ground w/his work on the No Asshole Rule. Again taking a step back (granularity, fractalization) scale this up and ask what kind of human resource environment enlists people’s enthusiasms. It’s no accident that startups are long hours and craziness. People can see the direct impact and the rewards – and you’re no swamped with b.s. The best metaphor/model I heard about was the way 17thC pirates managed crew relations; and it’s not what you think. To save myself some trouble and hopefully OT here’s a collection of three posts based on Sutton’s and my x-riffing on the topic: http://tinyurl.com/2ey4mg
The pirate story included.
My bottomline – good people environments are the least appreciate and most under-developed aspect of running a good organization. And my proposed HR strategy is just exactly to treat each side as adults instead of parent child – or priest, acolyte and worshipers.
We could do a lot better by focusing on results.
To wrap the anecdotes when I first went to IBM we still had to fill out timecards, a legacy of 19thC mfg. and therbligs. Once you get into that mind set you never get out. Oddly, IMHO, the best organizations for pushing responsibility and authority as far out as possible is the US military, especially the USMC. Some great case studies there.

Tim Walker February 13th, 2008 7:30 am

Kyle — The sad thing is that so many managers think that this is what they’re *supposed* to do in their jobs. This means that they *intentionally* waste their own time and energy micromanaging instead of freeing up their people to do more / better / bigger / smarter work.

[...] in an unfeeling corporate world, eh? It’s amazing what a little common sense can do. I think Cali and Jody would be [...]

[...] The Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE): a first look. [...]

[...] The Results-Only Work Environment (ROWE): a first look. (Interesting: this post drew substantially more hits that my review of the book on ROWE.) [...]

Leave A Comment