“Change or Die”: Possibly my favorite business-magazine article ever.

Three years ago Fast Company published an Alan Deutschman article that opened my eyes to the deep need for better-informed psychological approaches to the world of business. Deutschman, who later expanded the article into a book, launched the piece with a one of those crackerjack openings that magazine writers pine for:
Change or Die.
What if you were given that choice? For real. What if it weren’t just the hyperbolic rhetoric that conflates corporate performance with life and death? Not the overblown exhortations of a rabid boss, or a slick motivational speaker, or a self-dramatizing CEO. We’re talking actual life or death now. Your own life or death. What if a well-informed, trusted authority figure said you had to make difficult and enduring changes in the way you think and act? If you didn’t, your time would end soon — a lot sooner than it had to. Could you change when change really mattered? When it mattered most?
Yes, you say?
Try again.
Yes?
You’re probably deluding yourself.
You wouldn’t change.
Don’t believe it? You want odds? Here are the odds, the scientifically studied odds: nine to one. That’s nine to one against you. How do you like those odds?
That, my friends, is how you open a magazine feature. The piece goes on to explain that Deutschman learned of those odds at an IBM “Global Innovation Outlook” conference, where Dr. Ray Levey of the Global Medical Forum and Dr. Edward Miller of Johns Hopkins delivered the sobering news that (a) many of the largest and most expensive health problems in the U.S. arise from behavioral factors — not genetics or antigens, yet (b) very few patients, even those who have come through traumatic open-heart surgery, succeed in changing their behaviors to prevent recurrence of their disease.
Please do read the whole article, which goes on to discuss how Dr. Dean Ornish and others have developed successful holistic programs designed to combine the latest developments in cardiac medicine with behavioral techniques like meditation and group therapy to promote lasting behavioral changes in their heart patients. The piece then goes on to transfer the medical observations into a business setting.
Once you’ve read it, I invite you to contemplate these business ramifications — and especially to understand better “[w]hat [it is] about how our brains are wired that resists change so tenaciously.” If heart-bypass patients with persistent chest pains find it hard to go on a low-fat diet and get a modicum of exercise, is it any wonder that your department is having trouble implementing the new quarterly review system effectively?
My own photocopy of the original magazine article is littered with my handwritten notations, in different colors of ink that reflect the number of times I’ve been back over the piece. Among many other interesting tidbits:
- “Compelling, positive visions of the future are a much stronger inspiration for change” than fear is.
- “Behavior change happens mostly be speaking to people’s feelings,” not by “giving people accurate analyses and factual information about their situations.”
- Because change implies “an emotional struggle[,] it’s important to change quickly enough to feel the short-term benefits that give a psychic lift and make it easier to stick with change.”
- Major corporate restructurings imply the hard task of reframing issues for large groups of people, yet the most successful restructurings progress quickly — even radically — rather than gradually.
To me, one of the most encouraging things in the article is the proposition that we can change our brains on purpose — that we can use behavior-based learning and other techniques to change the very way we think about the world around us.
This means that we need not be condemned to suffer like the 90% of heart patients who relapse into heart-unhealthy behaviors. Instead, we can be like the 77% of Dean Ornish’s patients who maintained their healthier lifestyles, even years after they had “graduated” from Ornish’s program.
If today didn’t work well for you or for your organization, don’t despair, because tomorrow need not be like today. As individuals and in groups, we can think and act differently. In a sense, the leopard can change its spots. Read “Change or Die” to start thinking about how.
(Photo by clix.)
Category: The working lifeIf you liked this post, please consider subscribing to the RSS feed so you can receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.
4 Comments so far
Leave A Comment

Robert Kegan and Lisa Lahey did wonderful work on this topic (the resistance to change), which they published in a book with a remarkably unwieldy title: “How the Way We Talk Can Change the Way We Think.” (They also published a short version of the book in the HBR.)
Essentially, they argue that people are masters at keeping themselves and their emotional commitments in equilibrium. So for every overt commitment to, say, exercising more, there’s a hidden commitment that keeps people from actually implementing it. That hidden commitment might be the fear of appearing lazy, or it might be a need to appear gainfully employed to one’s spouse, etc. The point is that we have to understand and change those hidden commitments if the desired change is to take hold.
Tim – excellent post. I’ll have to track down, read and study/re-study it. Over the years of trying to start new efforts or re-factor existing ones this is a topic on which my collection of bloody arrows has gotten very large. Reading your post two interesting references, actually three…well a Monty Python moment. The first being Drucker’s famous dictum, “change your people….or change your people” – reinforced by Jim Collins “get the right people on the bus”..or for that matter Machiavelli who diagnosed the problem 500 years ago and whose dictum we posted around or workrooms. More immediately Sharon Begely has a great new book out on training your mind to change your brain:
http://tinyurl.com/25w7tg
Along with that Doug Finkelstein’s book on “Why Smart Executives Fail” did a pretty thorough study and found that the primary cause was not mis-understanding reality it was denying it:
http://tinyurl.com/ys9c27
Think about that for a minute as you look at the headlines – we’re surrounded by massive risk of serious business failures or problems and almost all of them are traceable to “cognitive dissonance” on the part of the responsible parties.
Very good thoughts on underlying cognitive issues, guys. Much to ponder . . .
[...] change their actions unless they change their whole way of looking at things. It’s true of heart patients trying to live longer. It’s true of people who want to fix what’s broken in their lives. And it’s true [...]