Avoiding the Kitty Genovese syndrome in business.

Kitty Genovese, you’ll recall, was the victim in a dark episode in modern urban history: she was stalked and murdered in Queens, New York in 1964 — not in silence or seclusion, but in the full hearing of her neighbors, all of whom assumed that someone else would do something about what they were all hearing. Horrified reactions to her death prompted not just intense media coverage, but a wave of research into what we now call the “bystander effect.”
Usually I try not to think about gruesome things like Genovese’s untimely end, and I would never make a straight-up comparison between the frustrations we face in the workplace and the murder of an innocent woman. But I was reminded of Genovese and the bystander effect by a short, powerful item by Francois Gossieaux that I came across this morning.1
The Conspiracy Of Silence – how silence fails — and sometimes kills.
Before turning to the business applications of his thoughts, Gossieaux talks about how this “conspiracy of silence” — the thought that I’m not going to speak up because no one else has — genuinely can kill, for example when hospital staffers do not speak up about problems they see.2 He summarizes thus:
Most of us have been in organizations where it is politically unacceptable to speak openly about what is going wrong – only to see projects fail because of weak sponsorship, unreasonable constraints, unmotivated team members, or plain old politics. It is sort of ironic that while not speaking up will eventually kill the organization in which you work and thus your current job prospect – it is job preservation that drives this behavior.
Note Gossieaux’s accurate language: “politically unacceptable.” Not “technically incorrect.” Not “against explicit policy.” Not “actively discouraged by management.” But “politically unacceptable.” In theory, organizations should be run for maximum efficiency and productivity; in theory, professional businesspeople should act like grown-ups who are open to honest critiques of their actions, policies, or performance.
But that’s only in theory. In real life, people are people, and mostly they (read: we) don’t want to be criticized. Too often they (we) overinterpret criticisms as personal slights or underhanded attacks. Or, worse, we don’t encounter the need to interpret criticisms at all . . . because they’re never offered in the first place. Like Kitty Genovese’s neighbors, we sit around hoping that someone else will raise the alarm. And then after the fact we all talk about what a shame it is that no one did anything, and that poor girl . . .
Listen, unless you’re doing something like running an emergency room, business is not a case of life or death. It is, though, a matter of livelihoods and, more broadly, of human fulfillment — and therefore it’s worth doing well.3
Don’t be a bystander. Don’t be one of those who will be left thinking, “Maybe I could have done something . . .” The regrets aren’t worth it.
Refuse to join the conspiracy of silence.
~
1. As if in confirmation of my prior post, this link came to me through friends on Twitter.
2. This tendency has been countered in hospitals by the use of checklists as promoted by Dr. Peter Pronovost, which we discussed here and here.
3. If you think it’s not worth doing well, you need different work.
(Photo by victoriapeckham.)
Category: The language of business, The working lifeIf you liked this post, please consider subscribing to the RSS feed so you can receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.
3 Comments so far
Leave A Comment

I love this post. I get so hepped up on this topic. Too many people stay quiet because they’re afraid of rocking the boat. I think that mostly comes from our human fear of being wrong. We worry: “What happens if I say something and others don’t agree? Or worse yet, I’m proven wrong?”
I *hate* appearing “wrong” or “stupid”. Honestly, I think it’s my tragic flaw in some situations. But ironically, I’m also known for speaking up when everyone else is silent. I call 911 more than anyone I know. (I think I might be in line for some sort of gold star for civic duty.) I figure if I see something suspect or someone in need, it’s just good karma to call for aid. After all, wouldn’t I want someone to do the same for me?
In business settings, I learned to voice my concerns as questions, as a gentler way of pointing out issues. But I had a boss who told me that I challenged people too much and that “the world doesn’t know what to do with people like you.” She wanted me to funnel my passion into something “more positive,” which I think translated to “stop asking your superiors such hard questions!”
Stand up and speak up, people! If you don’t, who will? Do it in your own way, in your own style. But for everyone’s sake–including your own–don’t be afraid to rock the boat. The alternative is calmly sitting on a sinking ship.
Hi Tim,
Thank you for expanding on my post. The book that I was referencing in the first place talks about a similar tragedy.
The key thing that most people do not realize is that this behavior is not based on individual behavior, but rather on social behavior. And while we can try to change it by appealing to individuals to change their own behavior, it will not change unless there is a social behavioral change – meaning that some fundamental social norms need to change. It is still individuals that will make that happen, but it just requires a different approach…
Food for another post soon…
Francois
Jennifer: “calmly sitting on a sinking ship” is a good way of putting it, and it matches the kind of aversive behavior we’re used to seeing in, say, heart patients and serial bankrupts: they *want* things to be better, but they *don’t* change behavior.
Francois: Thank you for your post, and for finding your way back here. You’re quite right to emphasize the social element. It’s one thing for a person to exhibit psychosis (or just aversive behavior), but it’s something again when it infects an entire culture – whether we’re talking about one organization or business culture more widely. We end up with far too many scenarios like those Jennifer describes, when her efforts to intervene are judged, basically, as *unthinkable*. It’s mass dysfunction, and it needs mass-scale treatment.
Let’s all keep up this conversation so that we can be part of the cure, instead of part of the disease.