Business Blog: Hoover’s Business Insight Zone

Mike Chapman speaks sense about the blogger-P.R. feud.

If you follow the world of social media, you could be forgiven for thinking that the bloggers and the public-relations folk have descended into the same sort of East Coast / West Coast feud that turned Tupac Shakur and Biggie Smalls into martyrs at young ages.

The gauntlet thrown.

Earlier this week, Gina Trapani of the popular Lifehacker blog issued, shall we say, a beatdown to the p.r. firms that she thinks have been irresponsible in their pitches to her. She set up a wiki (find it here) that lists all of the firms — not just individual p.r. practitioners — that she has now blacklisted from her e-mail inbox.

This is just the latest salvo in a war between p.r. folks, who say they are just trying to do their jobs (but who are sometimes tone-deaf to the ways that the social media operate) and bloggers, who say that they can’t stand p.r. spam (but many of whom are just as open to a good p.r. pitch as any old-school magazine editor).

A voice of reason.

Into this chaos rides Mike Chapman of the Every Dot Connects blog, who hoses down the respective parties with a cold blast of common sense:

New Rules

” . . . No standard set of rules applies. For the millions of blogs now in existence, each is their own nation, with their own local laws and customs. If it sounds like too much work, then it’s probably not the work you should be doing.”

That sounds remarkably like common sense to me.

My own experience.

As I said in the comments to Mike’s post, this makes me think of two things:

  1. In my bachelor days, I came to the not-very-groundbreaking insight that different women liked to be approached different ways. Some women didn’t want to be flirted with, ever, even if you were dating them. Others would flirt with you while they were holding hands with their boyfriend — not because they were unfaithful, but because they liked the playfulness of it. Some would only date you if they knew you very well; others might go out with you if they barely knew you. The point: PEOPLE VARY. [Wait, where have we heard this before?]
  2. In the business world, I’ve had bosses who wanted airtight documentation to back up every decision, and I’ve had bosses who would never, ever read an e-mail that was more than six lines long. Which way is right? DEPENDS ON WHO YOU’RE DEALING WITH.

Honestly, you’d think it wouldn’t be this hard. Kudos to Mike for the note of sanity.

~

More context:

~

(Image of the Battle of Najera from Wikipedia.)

Category: Social media

2 Comments so far

Donald E. L. Johnson May 16th, 2008 7:58 pm

As a daily newspaper financial journalist, news releases were important starting points for stories, and, frequently, all we did was rewrite them with additional information we gathered by making a few calls. We also used news releases on trade pubs, but much less frequently, because trade pubs are more focused on enterprise reporting. Our stories made the news rather than just report earnings and new products news.

As a health care and financial blogger over the last five plus years, I’ve used releases probably a couple dozen times until recently. Now I write about stocks, and a lot of stories are pegged to earnings reports announced in news releases. But most often, I just link to the releases and conference call transcripts and devote most of my blog to analysis and commentary based on data I find around the net.

I don’t get many news releases, and I almost never use the ones I get, because they aren’t pertinent. Few know my e-mail addresses, which I don’t publish at this point. What I do is seek out the earnings reports that look interesting and build on the data that they report.

Financial reporting, of course, is different from blogging on new gadgets, videos and personalities.

If you don’t want news releases, don’t give out your e-mail address. Sign up for the PR and Business Wire services and select the ones that will work for you, or work without them.

You can sneer at flacks, but imho, you’re just saying that your blog isn’t meant to report news but to make it. If you don’t use news releases directly, I’m guessing you’re commenting on news that originated with a news release at some point or you’re just commenting on events that you witness or read about or experience, all of which are ok. Just understand that some use news releases and some may or may not, and that’s ok, too.

And, yes, I too comment on a log of blogs and boards as well as write my own blogs.

Tim Walker May 20th, 2008 9:59 am

Thanks for the detailed comment, Donald. I think we’re on the same page here: different folks will work in different flavors . . . like they always have . . . which is OKAY.

Leave A Comment