Are you willing to re-tool your swing?

Woods on the eve of his epic 2008 U.S. Open win.
I try to keep my use of sports metaphors to a minimum, both because (a) these metaphors tend to be overused in American business, which can be alienating to non-sports fans and to those who grew up following sports outside the U.S. mainstream, and (b) once you get me started . . . sheesh, next thing you know, I’ll be constructing some overblown metaphor about how today’s worldwide credit crunch is like the Knicks‘ salary-cap problems.
That way lies madness, I think you’ll agree.
All that said, I share the awe expressed by Tom Peters over Tiger Woods’s dramatic win in the U.S. Open playoff a week ago. Because of my travel schedule, I was able to watch a lot of that Monday playoff round, and it was amazing to see Woods play and win despite obvious pain from his badly injured left knee.
Here’s what Peters had to say:
I was reading a David Brooks column (New York Times) on Mr Woods yesterday, and was reminded of what, to me, is the most astonishing part of the Woods story. Namely, that on two occasions Woods no less than “risked his career,” per Brooks, re-tooling his (already amazing!!) swing — and then survived months and months of inconsistent performance to get into his new groove. [. . .]
How do you get the nerve to do such a thing — or even admit that it needs to be done when you are sitting atop the personal or professional or corporate skyscraper?
Good question — we’ll come back to that in just a minute. Meanwhile, the David Brooks column that Peters points to is also well worth reading. Here’s the context for the bit that Peters cites.
And here we’re getting to the nub of what’s so remarkable about the “Be A Tiger” phenomenon: He’s become the beau ideal for golf-loving corporate America, the personification of mental fortitude.
The ancients were familiar with physical courage and the priests with moral courage, but in this over-communicated age when mortals feel perpetually addled, Woods is the symbol of mental willpower. He is, in addition, competitive, ruthless, unsatisfied by success and honest about his own failings. (Twice, he risked his career to retool his swing.)
In the business world, we all know plenty of people who have some of these traits but not all of them. For example, a CEO might have a strong will and be as self-assured, competitive, and ruthless as Woods, yet without the ability to be honest about his or her own failings. And we all know businesspeople who are honest about their own failings and extraordinarily hard-working, yet lack the sort of ruthless drive that characterizes Woods or, say, Steve Jobs.
In his classic book Good to Great, Jim Collins studied more than a dozen companies that “retooled their swings,” transforming themselves from run-of-the-pack competitors to perennial top performers. One of the commonalities Collins identified for this group of companies was the willingness of their CEOs to submerge their own egos as they made the hard choices to “retool their swings.” One example that springs to mind was Darwin Smith, the great leader who sold Kimberly-Clark’s paper mills along the way to making that company a titan in consumer paper goods.
Smith was hardly lacking in self-confidence, and he had a strong will interwoven with a competitive streak. But he was so committed to making himself and his company better that he wasn’t afraid to slaughter any sacred cows. Extracting Kimberly-Clark from the business of running paper mills was definitely one of those, since many insiders regarded the mills as the company’s touchstone to its past.
I’m hardly the first to make the connection between the mindset shared by Woods and Darwin Smith. Right now I’m reading Carol Dweck’s terrific book Mindset. The book’s fundamental theme is that high perfomers across many areas share a “growth mindset,” one that focuses on endless improvement, instead of the “fixed mindset” that leads people to believe that they’re either great or mediocre or terrible — but in any case not subject to improvement. Dweck, who wrote the book based on decades of research as a psychology professor at Columbia, Stanford, and elsewhere, talks specifically about the CEOs from Good to Great, and about sporting legends like Woods and Michael Jordan.
The commonality between all of these people, regardless of field, was that all of them maintained a supple mind and a staunch commitment to ongoing growth. All of them, therefore, were ready to venture in a new direction — to “retool their swings” — when conditions warranted.
This, I think, answers Peters’s question:
How do you get the nerve to do such a thing — or even admit that it needs to be done when you are sitting atop the personal or professional or corporate skyscraper?
You get it by having a mindset that isn’t satisfied with what you already have — a mindset that is committed to the fundamental concept that you can be better tomorrow than you are today by dint of hard work and a focused program of improvement.
~
Related items of interest:
- Ron Sirak of Golf World writes on Tiger Woods’s force of will.
- Guy Kawasaki on Carol Dweck and Mindset: Part 1 and Part 2.
- “Tighten Your Belt, Strengthen Your Mind” - a New York Times article about methods to increase willpower via practice.
~
(Photo by Jim Epler.)
Category: Management, The business brain, The business of sports7 Comments so far
Leave A Comment
Subscribe to the RSS Feed
Great post. Well-done.
And very smart to stay out of the Knicks-universe. Nothing [good] to see here, folks.
I resoundingly agree with the spirit of this. In a significant sense, though, it still begs the question, at least for those wanting to create Tiger-like success for themselves or their companies. Of course, answering that question was likely never the intention of your post - that is, you meant to discover, not dissect.
Indeed, it is beyond the scope of a single blog post, but a number of questions persist that I think are worth throwing into this pot you’ve given some adroit stirs:
1. How does one *get* this mindset described in your closing statement?
2. How did Tiger get it? (*There’s* a dauntingly complex, yet fascinating study in nurture vs. nature.) How does he maintain or protect it?
3. What factors are unique to Tiger and what are applicable to running one’s life or company?
4. What are the differences and similarities in why they are applied (e.g. to be the world’s all-time greatest golfer (Tiger), or the catalyst for a nation’s freedom and a new paradigm on how to achieve that (Gandhi), or the builder of a monolithic retailer (Sam Walton))? Do they matter? If so, how?
To list but a few.
*
On the other hand there’s this wonderfully clever, funny and pointed Michael Lewis comment in Bloomberg: http://tinyurl.com/3grc6s which does point out that golf is not Omaha Beach nor Fallujah. Forgive me - he even questions whether golf is a sport in fact.
Chris — Excellent questions. Summary answers for now:
1. Dweck discusses this in her book, which I’ll be reviewing soon. I think this is a major question that companies should be asking: How do we help our people get better at what they do, from mindset on down?
2. Check out the Sirak piece I linked to - Tiger got a lot of it from his father, methinks.
3. This is the zillion-dollar question, and the reason that Tiger has been written about so much in a personal development (or business skills) vein: the assumption — correct, I think — that much of what animates him *could* be put into play for each of us, at least as some level.
4. This leads to a lot of richness of discussion, so I’m all for it in general. But for myself, I’m also trying to short-circuit over-analysis. E.g. in this case, Woods, Gandhi, and Walton all are excellent examples of willpower. Now, how can I get more willpower for myself, and what could I use that willpower to help me accomplish?
In other words, instead of parsing every little piece of minutia in the psyche of Woods or Gandhi or whoever, how can *I* move forward today with that *I* need to do?
Would love to hear more of your thoughts on this.
First, to dblwyo’s comment — I sympathize. That’s part of what I was alluding to with my fourth question. I won’t go into a detailed response to that because that’s getting into a lengthy philosophical discussion, although it’s one I would love to have.
To your points, Tim:
1. I’m interested in hearing Dweck’s take on the subject, and I didn’t mean to suggest my question was a new one or that I wasn’t aware no one has tried to answer it. People have and will continue to try to answer it because I don’t think anyone has found a satisfactory or complete one — it is, in my eyes, another zillion-dollar question.
2. Tiger’s father’s influence is legendary, at least in the golf world. It was the impetus behind this second question. Tennis stars Venus and Serena Williams also come to mind in this category. They are extreme examples of the part nurture plays, specifically from parents. Finding a mentor is often cited as a key to success, and that underscores the importance nurture plays.
3. I would put a couple more asterisks around the “could” in your statement. That’s part of what has driven this discussion so interminably: Yes, it *could* be - so why is it so difficult? I think the particularly worded question “What makes Tiger so different/special?” is one that should be looked at closer.
4. I agree with this, that taking this attitude is the better (at least faster) road to personal improvement than over-analysis. But now, it seems, we’re talking about two different things: “How can I improve” versus “How can I be like Tiger, Jordan, Schweitzer, Newton, etc.?” Certainly both are worth pursuing, and perhaps this falls into the cart-before-the-horse category.
Or I may be looking for a brilliant excuse for my colossal under-achieving….
Thanks for the detailed response, Chris.
1. The question of motivation is also a major one uncovered by the work of psychologist Anders Ericsson (which I discussed a bit here and here). His research shows that top performers engage in years’ worth of hours-per-day “deliberate practice” — but doesn’t reveal why, say, Jascha Heifetz had this motivation while I don’t.
3. To me, the question isn’t “Why is it so difficult?,” since the difficulties would be instantly obvious if you or I tried to follow Woods’s workout/practice regime. To me the bigger question is “Why don’t more of us even *get started*?” Which gets us back to the motivation question in point 1.
4. I agree that we may have the cart before the horse. You can merge the two questions into one, surely, e.g. “How can I improve in Jordan’s direction?” Doesn’t mean you’ll end up “like” him, but for many people, even closing half the distance toward the giants in their field would be a huge victory.
As for excuses, well, you and me both, buddy . . .
[...] Are you willing to re-tool your swing? [...]