Alcatel-Lucent: What if NOBODY can fix it?

The other shoe finally, finally drops at the trans-Atlantic telecom equipment maker:
Alcatel-Lucent’s Russo, Tchuruk to Quit; Loss Widens
Alcatel-Lucent SA, the world’s largest supplier of fixed-line phone networks, said Chief Executive Officer Patricia Russo and Chairman Serge Tchuruk quit after the sixth straight quarterly loss.
The second-quarter net loss widened to 1.1 billion euros ($1.7 billion), or 49 cents a share, from 586 million euros, or 26 cents, a year earlier, the Paris-based company said in a statement today.
Russo and Tchuruk were the architects of Alcatel SA’s November 2006 purchase of Lucent Technologies Inc., creating a company that has never earned a profit, shed 62 percent of its market value and is eliminating 16,500 jobs. [. . .]
It’s not like we couldn’t see this coming. The merger seemed like a bad idea to many outside observers (including some of my colleagues here at Hoover’s) from the beginning. How was the combination of two bloated, slow companies — much less two companies with cultures forged on opposite sides of the Atlantic — supposed to compete with better with smart outfits like Ericsson and, above all, Cisco?
It never made sense . . . not that that stopped them from going ahead with it.
Now here’s the challenge of all challenges: if the combined Alcatel-Lucent never made sense, is there any leader or leadership team that can make sense of it?
~
Related posts:
- Alcatel-Lucent and the right way to do layoffs.
- Alcatel-Lucent — Company of the Day.
- Disorganization Negates Talent.
- A quick summary of the telecom equipment sector.
- Alcatel-Lucent: Ou sont les synergies?
~
Category: TelecomIf you liked this post, please consider subscribing to the RSS feed so you can receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.
1 Comment so far
Leave A Comment

[...] best in terms of profitability. And many mergers — such as the ill-starred combinations of Alcatel and Lucent, or Time Warner and AOL — are made with a hard focus on the top line . . . but a lot of [...]