Managers beware: Facebook isn’t the problem — e-mail is.

The skepticism aimed at social-media use within companies would be more aptly directed toward e-mail use, a source of far more wasted time for workers, and one that has become as invisible as oxygen for most of us.

This BBC article — “Bosses ’should embrace Facebook’” quotes a sensible study that argues for open-minded views toward the use of social media in the workplace:

“In today’s difficult business environment, the instinctive reaction can be to batten down the hatches and return to the traditional command-and-control techniques that enable managers to closely monitor and measure productivity.

“Allowing workers to have more freedom and flexibility might seem counter-intuitive, but it appears to create businesses more capable of maintaining stability.”

As I’ve argued before, command-and-control is dying a well-deserved death in the enlightened workplace, and certainly in the realm of social media.

But given my thoughts — and especially Dan Markovitz’s thoughts — on how e-mail so pervasively corrupts the typical office environment, it’s worthwhile to shine the same kind of spotlight on e-mail as well.

Consider this series of quotations from the BBC article, applying each to e-mail instead of social media:

Social networking can encourage employees to build relationships with colleagues across a firm, it added. . . . Firms are increasingly using networking software to share documents and collaborate in ideas, the research found.

When e-mail came into broad use in the early 1990s, smart companies quickly found out the same thing.

“Banning Facebook and the like goes against the grain of how people want to interact. Often people are friends with colleagues through these networks and it is how some develop their relationships.”

Using technology to build closer links with ex-employees and potential customers could also boost productivity, innovation and create a more democratic working environment, Mr Bradwell added.

It took a while for this insight to penetrate some corners of the working world, and indeed there are still older executives (Henry Paulson, Donald Trump, and Richard Branson come to mind) who never use e-mail. But for the most part, its merits for collaboration and productivity are clear.

But he argued the use of networking sites “must be tied to a business goal”.

And here we come to the crux: many businesses have rushed to block access to Facebook, LinkedIn, et al., without stopping to think that their people are already wasting much more time on e-mail.

The report’s authors said that clear guidelines needed to be set out about appropriate use of social networking.

And there should be no hesitation in telling employees who spent “unreasonable” amounts of time using technology for non-work related activity that their behaviour must change, they added.

Here’s the kicker: it’s obvious enough that someone is wasting the company’s time if they’re playing Scrabble with their friends via Facebook. But the lost productivity of fruitless e-mail — especially e-mail that’s ostensibly meant to propel work projects — goes totally unnoticed in many organizations.

Worse, in many organizations people face penalties if they use e-mail the smart way — that is, if they turn it off for long stretches of the day so that they can get their work done.

“But it is also good for companies to be aware of the tensions and look at deploying practical guidelines which will protect the positive impact of networks, not hamper it.”

Well said, and smart companies are already figuring out sensible guidelines for spending time on Facebook, LinkedIn, blogs, and so during work hours. But they need to remember that the most pervasive social medium in the workplace is e-mail.

Get e-mail right, and you can probably afford to let your folks play a game of Scrabble when they want.

~

Related posts:

~

(Hat tip: Jeremiah Owyang.)

Category: Management, Productivity, Social media

If you liked this post, please consider subscribing to the RSS feed so you can receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.

7 Comments so far

Dan Markovitz November 6th, 2008 10:12 am

I’m a firm believer in setting broad guidelines and giving people room to live within those. Setting hard and fast rules lead immediately to workers figuring out how to game the system.

If you tell your staff they get 10 days of vacation, they’ll immediately think of a way to get 11 or 12 days. If you tell them that you trust them and that they simply need to get the job done, they make take fewer days, and in any event, will accomplish their goals.

Ban Facebook? Now you’ve just motivated staff to find a way around the ban. Tell them they can play Scrabble so long as they get their work done? Now you’re on the road to a happier, healthier, more productive workplace.

(Of course, this means that your company has to hire the right kind of people….)

Miz Liz November 6th, 2008 11:18 am

I think that Dan hit the nail here – ban it and you make it worse. Flexibility within an established framework coupled with management’s trust in their staff makes for a more productive worker. Whether it’s email, cell phones or facebook, workers need to stay connected to the outside world, even in their little cubicles.

Scott Hanson November 6th, 2008 1:01 pm

Exactly – and don’t forget that email is as addictive as gambling :

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/aug/28/email.addiction

Dr Tom Stafford, a lecturer at the University of Sheffield and co-author of the book Mind Hacks, believes that the same fundamental learning mechanisms that drive gambling addicts are also at work in email users. “Both slot machines and email follow something called a ‘variable interval reinforcement schedule’,” he says, “which has been established as the way to train in the strongest habits. This means that rather than reward an action every time it is performed, you reward it sometimes, but not in a predictable way. So with email, usually when I check it there is nothing interesting, but every so often there’s something wonderful – an invite out, or maybe some juicy gossip – and I get a reward.” This is enough to make it difficult for us to resist checking email, even when we’ve only just looked.

Tim Walker November 10th, 2008 3:07 pm

Thanks for the comment, Scott, and especially for the link. Once you mentioned it, I remembered having seen (some years ago, if memory serves) an article about variable reinforcement. The experiment cited had to do with giving a variable interval reinforcement schedule to monkeys who could push a button to *sometimes* get a piece of fruit; they couldn’t keep themselves away from that button.

[...] That’s the takeaway lesson from a Guardian article that Scott Hanson was kind enough to point out in a comment a little while back. [...]

[...] Managers beware: Facebook isn’t the problem — e-mail is. [...]

[...] said something similar before, and now Joshua-Michéle Ross of O’Reilly Radar says it well in this post: The fact is that [...]

Leave A Comment