Should we have a “floor” price for fossil fuels?

Lately I’ve seen this idea in several places, that governments should intervene to ensure that gasoline (or coal etc.) stays above a certain price — $4.00 per gallon of gasoline, for instance — so that consumers, entrepreneurs, utility companies, auto makers et al. will know that they can never expect a return of lower fuel prices, and therefore ought to turn their efforts to conservation, alternative energy sources, and so on.

Whether the idea should be pursued, I don’t know. Its political feasibility, I certainly doubt. But with it in the back of my mind, I was intrigued to come across the following passage from Anthony Sampson, The Seven Sisters: The Great Oil Companies and the World They Shaped, which was published in 1975:

In February 1975 Dr. Kissinger [who was then Secretary of State] came out with another brand-new policy, formulated by his new energy expert at the State Department, Thomas Enders . . . Kissinger now proposed that there should be an agreed “floor price” below which the industrialized countries would not allow oil to be sold, so that new investments and alternative fuels would be safeguarded. The scheme had powerful logic behind it, but it was very difficult to decide what the floor should be. While a floor of $6 to $7 [per barrel of oil] seemed appropriate to protect coal or domestic oil, a figure of $12 seemed necessary to protect such innovations of [Colorado] oil-shale: so that the floor seemed in danger of meeting the ceiling. . . . In any case there was little chance of agreement from most Europeans, who saw little prospect of developing serious alternatives. The definition of the floor price was never fully worked out, and the idea was virtually shelved by March 1975.

The timeframe of this idea — two months in 1975 — reminds me of what we’ve seen happen lately to the price of gasoline in the United States. Its precipitous drop over the past couple of months has, among other things, spurred sales of pickup trucks.

But what the long-term implications are, it’s impossible to tell. If they’re anything like they were in the 1970s, it could be a long while yet before we see any serious policy initiative in the direction of renewable energy sources. (Then again, President-Elect Obama has at least talked a good show about renewables, though only time will tell how that plays out.)

My guess is that there’s more momentum these days for renewables, and that the price of oil (ergo gasoline) will rise from its current (relative) depths. But with recessionary headlines like the ones we’ve been getting, I wouldn’t bet on it.

Category: Economics, Energy

If you liked this post, please consider subscribing to the RSS feed so you can receive future articles delivered to your feed reader.

3 Comments so far

Devin @ CoolProducts November 7th, 2008 3:17 pm

I read your title and was like surely he doesn’t want a price “floor”!

But you know what, I think you’ve got a good idea here. As much as it makes me cringe @ the idea of having a $4 price floor, I can see it having long-term benefits.

tecosystems » links for 2008-11-07 November 7th, 2008 6:02 pm

[...] Should we have a “floor” price for fossil fuels? — Hoover’s Business Insight Zone "Lately I’ve seen this idea in several places, that governments should intervene to ensure that gasoline (or coal etc.) stays above a certain price — $4.00 per gallon of gasoline, for instance — so that consumers, entrepreneurs, utility companies, auto makers et al. will know that they can never expect a return of lower fuel prices, and therefore ought to turn their efforts to conservation, alternative energy sources, and so on. Whether the idea should be pursued, I don’t know." – that depends on what the goal is. if it is to compel real, fundamental change in our consumption habits – at any cost – then yes. if it's to continue pulling the band-aid off slowly, then no. (tags: gas economics prices floor fossil fuels) [...]

[...] Hoover’s Tim Walker, I’ve seen the question of a floor for fuel pricing surface repeatedly. My link to the above [...]

Leave A Comment