<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch out for chokepoints!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/02/03/watch-out-for-chokepoints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/02/03/watch-out-for-chokepoints/</link>
	<description>Individuals &#8212; Companies &#8212; Industries: How We Work Now.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:31:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: An Insidious Disease &#171; A Dime a Dozen Small Business, Tech and Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/02/03/watch-out-for-chokepoints/comment-page-1/#comment-14026</link>
		<dc:creator>An Insidious Disease &#171; A Dime a Dozen Small Business, Tech and Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=1787#comment-14026</guid>
		<description>[...] Insidious&#160;Disease    Last week I wrote a post referencing Tim Walkers Watch out for chokepoints! In that post I wrote that IT can be a key bottleneck in those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Insidious&nbsp;Disease    Last week I wrote a post referencing Tim Walkers Watch out for chokepoints! In that post I wrote that IT can be a key bottleneck in those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting Rid Of Chokepoints &#171; A Dime a Dozen Small Business, Tech and Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/02/03/watch-out-for-chokepoints/comment-page-1/#comment-13992</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting Rid Of Chokepoints &#171; A Dime a Dozen Small Business, Tech and Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=1787#comment-13992</guid>
		<description>[...] Getting Rid Of&#160;Chokepoints    Tim Walker at Business Insight Zone has an article titled; Watch out for chokepoints! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Getting Rid Of&nbsp;Chokepoints    Tim Walker at Business Insight Zone has an article titled; Watch out for chokepoints! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on chokepoints. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/02/03/watch-out-for-chokepoints/comment-page-1/#comment-13896</link>
		<dc:creator>More on chokepoints. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=1787#comment-13896</guid>
		<description>[...] I called them &#8220;chokepoints&#8221; the other day, but we also call them &#8220;bottlenecks&#8221; or &#8220;hangups&#8221; or &#8220;roadblock&#8221; or &#8220;pains in the a**.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I called them &#8220;chokepoints&#8221; the other day, but we also call them &#8220;bottlenecks&#8221; or &#8220;hangups&#8221; or &#8220;roadblock&#8221; or &#8220;pains in the a**.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/02/03/watch-out-for-chokepoints/comment-page-1/#comment-13878</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=1787#comment-13878</guid>
		<description>Absolutely it&#039;s related to red tape, Rusty -- and in fact I cut a reference to bureaucracy that I had put in my original post.

Ideally, organizations diversify and specialize separate functions -- that is, they create bureaucracies -- for better efficiency. And it works: it doesn&#039;t make sense to have your top salesperson and your top accounts-receivable clerk sharing each other&#039;s duties.

But it&#039;s also human nature to protect turf, and it&#039;s in the nature of organizations, best I can tell, to develop points of friction -- or chokepoints.

More on this in a follow-up post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely it&#8217;s related to red tape, Rusty &#8212; and in fact I cut a reference to bureaucracy that I had put in my original post.</p>
<p>Ideally, organizations diversify and specialize separate functions &#8212; that is, they create bureaucracies &#8212; for better efficiency. And it works: it doesn&#8217;t make sense to have your top salesperson and your top accounts-receivable clerk sharing each other&#8217;s duties.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s also human nature to protect turf, and it&#8217;s in the nature of organizations, best I can tell, to develop points of friction &#8212; or chokepoints.</p>
<p>More on this in a follow-up post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Fincke</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/02/03/watch-out-for-chokepoints/comment-page-1/#comment-13877</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Fincke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=1787#comment-13877</guid>
		<description>Tim, is this related anyway to red tape or bureaucracy of a company?  Because I believe that there is a lot of red tape and bureaucracy that a lot of us face when trying to make things happen at our jobs.

Granted, scheduling things like a conference room is something that shouldn&#039;t take long to do, but there are times when simply getting things accomplished is harder than it should be just to &quot;follow protocol&quot; or &quot;process&quot;.  So I can see chokepoints being all over the place that would take an army to change. 

And I am also finding out here at my company that because systems have been in place so long, people want to avoid change, even if it&#039;s means a change for the better.  So it&#039;s a vicious cycle at times too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, is this related anyway to red tape or bureaucracy of a company?  Because I believe that there is a lot of red tape and bureaucracy that a lot of us face when trying to make things happen at our jobs.</p>
<p>Granted, scheduling things like a conference room is something that shouldn&#8217;t take long to do, but there are times when simply getting things accomplished is harder than it should be just to &#8220;follow protocol&#8221; or &#8220;process&#8221;.  So I can see chokepoints being all over the place that would take an army to change. </p>
<p>And I am also finding out here at my company that because systems have been in place so long, people want to avoid change, even if it&#8217;s means a change for the better.  So it&#8217;s a vicious cycle at times too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
