<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eMusic, Sony, and the future of the music business.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/</link>
	<description>Individuals - Companies - Industries: How We Work Now.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:09:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A quick follow-up on eMusic. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/comment-page-1/#comment-14901</link>
		<dc:creator>A quick follow-up on eMusic. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=2966#comment-14901</guid>
		<description>[...] week I posted some thoughts from my colleague Chris Barton about the upcoming shift at eMusic, which will incorporate Sony&#8217;s back catalog into its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week I posted some thoughts from my colleague Chris Barton about the upcoming shift at eMusic, which will incorporate Sony&#8217;s back catalog into its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/comment-page-1/#comment-14835</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=2966#comment-14835</guid>
		<description>The sad thing is, Andie, that eMusic may come out ahead (based on the logic Chris lays out in his comment) even though they&#039;re alienating their long-term base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad thing is, Andie, that eMusic may come out ahead (based on the logic Chris lays out in his comment) even though they&#8217;re alienating their long-term base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andie</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/comment-page-1/#comment-14830</link>
		<dc:creator>Andie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=2966#comment-14830</guid>
		<description>Well, I for one, am angry about the change. There is no shortage of Sony&#039;s back catalog available on several websites. If I want that stuff I can go to iTunes or Amazon or wherever to get it. I have been a subscriber at eMusic for an entirely different reason: music discovery. Most of the new mainstream stuff they&#039;re adding I&#039;ve likely already discovered or am not interested in. 

I also am pissed about having my downloads almost cut in half. I&#039;ll give it a month or two and decide if the change is worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I for one, am angry about the change. There is no shortage of Sony&#8217;s back catalog available on several websites. If I want that stuff I can go to iTunes or Amazon or wherever to get it. I have been a subscriber at eMusic for an entirely different reason: music discovery. Most of the new mainstream stuff they&#8217;re adding I&#8217;ve likely already discovered or am not interested in. </p>
<p>I also am pissed about having my downloads almost cut in half. I&#8217;ll give it a month or two and decide if the change is worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/comment-page-1/#comment-14823</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=2966#comment-14823</guid>
		<description>I think Colin is right on the money regarding eMusic&#039;s logic -- the number of customers they drive away will likely be dwarfed by the number they attract.

Regardless of whether that&#039;s good business, eMusic is sending a mixed message that&#039;s almost certainly doing more harm than good to the company&#039;s most passionate customers. On the one hand, eMusic&#039;s welcome message and Your Account page are being straightforward -- many months in advance of the impact to some customers -- regarding the major price increases in store for existing customers.

(A little math on my part -- using numbers that eMusic makes very easy to access -- tells me that the 24 cents per track I&#039;m paying now will be going up to 42 cents per track if I keep getting the same number of downloads per month. I have until December to consider whether that&#039;s worth it.)

But the two blog posts in which eMusic discusses the Sony deal are -- knowing what the company has told me elsewhere about the price hike -- startlingly disingenuous.

For all the talk about eMusic’s customers being &quot;rabid, smart and adventurous consumers of music,&quot; the &quot;curatorial excellence&quot; of eMusic&#039;s presentation, and the company&#039;s promise to continue to &quot;be an alternative to mass market digital music stores — a deeper, richer music shopping experience,&quot; not a word is said about the very real hit awaiting customers&#039; wallets, or whether those higher prices are going to flow directly to Sony no matter how much Animal Collective or Neutral Milk Hotel (or how little Billy Joel) one buys.

That&#039;s disappointing. How disappointing? I&#039;ll decide in December.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Colin is right on the money regarding eMusic&#8217;s logic &#8212; the number of customers they drive away will likely be dwarfed by the number they attract.</p>
<p>Regardless of whether that&#8217;s good business, eMusic is sending a mixed message that&#8217;s almost certainly doing more harm than good to the company&#8217;s most passionate customers. On the one hand, eMusic&#8217;s welcome message and Your Account page are being straightforward &#8212; many months in advance of the impact to some customers &#8212; regarding the major price increases in store for existing customers.</p>
<p>(A little math on my part &#8212; using numbers that eMusic makes very easy to access &#8212; tells me that the 24 cents per track I&#8217;m paying now will be going up to 42 cents per track if I keep getting the same number of downloads per month. I have until December to consider whether that&#8217;s worth it.)</p>
<p>But the two blog posts in which eMusic discusses the Sony deal are &#8212; knowing what the company has told me elsewhere about the price hike &#8212; startlingly disingenuous.</p>
<p>For all the talk about eMusic’s customers being &#8220;rabid, smart and adventurous consumers of music,&#8221; the &#8220;curatorial excellence&#8221; of eMusic&#8217;s presentation, and the company&#8217;s promise to continue to &#8220;be an alternative to mass market digital music stores — a deeper, richer music shopping experience,&#8221; not a word is said about the very real hit awaiting customers&#8217; wallets, or whether those higher prices are going to flow directly to Sony no matter how much Animal Collective or Neutral Milk Hotel (or how little Billy Joel) one buys.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s disappointing. How disappointing? I&#8217;ll decide in December.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Alsheimer</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/comment-page-1/#comment-14822</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Alsheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=2966#comment-14822</guid>
		<description>Larger audience, more mass market appeal...it makes sense from a business perspective.  Plus those new sign-ups will never be the wiser.  That said, they risk severely ruining their brand positioning.

Used to be eMusic stood for Indie/Underground music and value.  Now its..mass market appeal and middle-of-the-pack pricing? 

Where&#039;s the differentiation now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larger audience, more mass market appeal&#8230;it makes sense from a business perspective.  Plus those new sign-ups will never be the wiser.  That said, they risk severely ruining their brand positioning.</p>
<p>Used to be eMusic stood for Indie/Underground music and value.  Now its..mass market appeal and middle-of-the-pack pricing? </p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the differentiation now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/comment-page-1/#comment-14821</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=2966#comment-14821</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, MK. (And to Colin, by the way.)

I wonder how this is supposed to play out? What&#039;s the logic on eMusic&#039;s end?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, MK. (And to Colin, by the way.)</p>
<p>I wonder how this is supposed to play out? What&#8217;s the logic on eMusic&#8217;s end?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mk</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/comment-page-1/#comment-14820</link>
		<dc:creator>mk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=2966#comment-14820</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a faithful eMusic subscriber since December 2003, and yesterday as I logged into my account I was greeted by a notice that my monthly downloads would drop from 90 to 50 for the exact same price. 

The beauty of eMusic was the fact that you could take a gamble on indie stuff you&#039;d never heard of on the cheap. I wasn&#039;t a subscriber for five years because I just didn&#039;t know who Bruce Springsteen was and am now overjoyed to have access to this undiscovered talent. 

I&#039;ll be canceling come July, which is a shame, but I simply can&#039;t continue to support a business that asks its customers to take less for the same price and like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a faithful eMusic subscriber since December 2003, and yesterday as I logged into my account I was greeted by a notice that my monthly downloads would drop from 90 to 50 for the exact same price. </p>
<p>The beauty of eMusic was the fact that you could take a gamble on indie stuff you&#8217;d never heard of on the cheap. I wasn&#8217;t a subscriber for five years because I just didn&#8217;t know who Bruce Springsteen was and am now overjoyed to have access to this undiscovered talent. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be canceling come July, which is a shame, but I simply can&#8217;t continue to support a business that asks its customers to take less for the same price and like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Alsheimer</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/02/emusic-sony-and-the-future-of-the-music-business/comment-page-1/#comment-14764</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Alsheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=2966#comment-14764</guid>
		<description>Tim,

I&#039;m sure that e-music will be able to do quite a bit with Sony&#039;s catalog.  It is exciting for them, and exciting for their customers, who, if they&#039;re anything like me, don&#039;t mind the occasional pop album mixed in with the Indie records.  

E-music has come a long way since I first joined in 2007.  Better interface, better selection...pretty much better everything.

What&#039;s frustrating, however, is that it seems like every time they make a major update or announcement, they make a change to the subscription program as well.  Since I&#039;ve joined, they&#039;ve cut the number of downloads you can get per subscription level twice. (granted, they do grandfather current members into the new program).

So yeah, they&#039;re adding some great new music to the catalog - but at the same time, they&#039;ve devalued their subscription model.  Is this a smart strategy?  I don&#039;t know, but I&#039;m guessing it isn&#039;t.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that e-music will be able to do quite a bit with Sony&#8217;s catalog.  It is exciting for them, and exciting for their customers, who, if they&#8217;re anything like me, don&#8217;t mind the occasional pop album mixed in with the Indie records.  </p>
<p>E-music has come a long way since I first joined in 2007.  Better interface, better selection&#8230;pretty much better everything.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s frustrating, however, is that it seems like every time they make a major update or announcement, they make a change to the subscription program as well.  Since I&#8217;ve joined, they&#8217;ve cut the number of downloads you can get per subscription level twice. (granted, they do grandfather current members into the new program).</p>
<p>So yeah, they&#8217;re adding some great new music to the catalog &#8211; but at the same time, they&#8217;ve devalued their subscription model.  Is this a smart strategy?  I don&#8217;t know, but I&#8217;m guessing it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
