<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We need better phrasing than &#8220;tech IPOs.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/12/we-need-better-phrasing-than-tech-ipos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/12/we-need-better-phrasing-than-tech-ipos/</link>
	<description>Individuals &#8212; Companies &#8212; Industries: How We Work Now.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:53:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A bumper crop of IPOs? -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/12/we-need-better-phrasing-than-tech-ipos/comment-page-1/#comment-14977</link>
		<dc:creator>A bumper crop of IPOs? -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=3058#comment-14977</guid>
		<description>[...] We need better phrasing than &#8220;tech IPOs.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We need better phrasing than &#8220;tech IPOs.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/12/we-need-better-phrasing-than-tech-ipos/comment-page-1/#comment-14871</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=3058#comment-14871</guid>
		<description>Yes! -- &quot;companies who create technology vs. those that leverage technology doing their business&quot; -- that&#039;s exactly what I was trying to say!

Glad if I&#039;ve shifted your worldview on this. Now if only the major business media would catch on . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! &#8212; &#8220;companies who create technology vs. those that leverage technology doing their business&#8221; &#8212; that&#8217;s exactly what I was trying to say!</p>
<p>Glad if I&#8217;ve shifted your worldview on this. Now if only the major business media would catch on . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Brownell</title>
		<link>http://www.hooversbiz.com/2009/06/12/we-need-better-phrasing-than-tech-ipos/comment-page-1/#comment-14867</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Brownell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooversbiz.com/?p=3058#comment-14867</guid>
		<description>Tim, you raise an interesting distinction that I had never really considered.  It boils down to companies who create technology vs. those that leverage technology doing their business.  If we called every business that leverages technology &quot;tech&quot;, then where would it stop?

After reading this, I will never think of &quot;tech&quot; the same way again.  I won&#039;t be a bit surprised to find myself watching financial news, subliminally counting how many errant tech references pop up an hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, you raise an interesting distinction that I had never really considered.  It boils down to companies who create technology vs. those that leverage technology doing their business.  If we called every business that leverages technology &#8220;tech&#8221;, then where would it stop?</p>
<p>After reading this, I will never think of &#8220;tech&#8221; the same way again.  I won&#8217;t be a bit surprised to find myself watching financial news, subliminally counting how many errant tech references pop up an hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
